5.B.1
Self-reflection: knowing what you bring into the room
Énoncé de compétence 5.B.1 d’ASPPB : Engage in ongoing, active self-reflection to enhance self-awareness (e.g., motivation, values, bias, well-being) and integrate this into one’s professional practice
Psychologists bring motivations, values, biases and their own well-being into every professional relationship. Active self-reflection means examining these regularly, during and after the work, and turning what is learned into changes in practice. It matters because unexamined values and automatic biases can shape judgments without awareness, and because the ethics codes expect psychologists to notice when personal problems may impair their work and to act before harm occurs.
Notions clés
- Reflection in and on action
- Schön described reflection-in-action: noticing surprise and adjusting while the work is under way. Reviewing work afterward, reflection-on-action, complements it. One catches a misstep in the moment; the other finds patterns across sessions and clients that no single moment reveals.
- Values and cultural self-awareness
- APA's Multicultural Guidelines ask psychologists to recognize that, as cultural beings, they hold attitudes and beliefs that shape how they perceive and interact with others and how they conceptualize clients. A value that feels like common sense may be one culture's norm.
- Implicit bias
- Health professionals show implicit racial and ethnic bias at levels similar to the general public, linked in some studies to interactions and outcomes. Yet meta-analyses disagree on how well Implicit Association Test scores predict behavior, so a score is a prompt to audit one's work, not a verdict.
- Well-being and competence
- Under APA Standard 2.06, psychologists refrain from work when personal problems are likely to impair it, and when they become aware of such problems they take steps such as consultation and decide whether to limit, suspend or end their work. The CPA code treats self-care under Responsible Caring.
- Self-doubt as a resource
- In one outpatient study, therapists who reported more professional self-doubt and also related to themselves kindly saw more client change in interpersonal distress, while little self-doubt combined with high self-regard was not a fruitful combination.
Exemple commenté
A psychologist raised to value early independence rereads three months of notes and sees that she has described two young adult clients who live with, and lean on, their parents as "enmeshed" and has steered both toward moving out. Neither client named leaving home as a goal.
- Reflection-on-action finds the pattern: the same label and the same push appear for clients whose families and cultures differ.
- Name the value behind it: her belief that healthy adults separate early from their parents is a cultural norm, not a clinical finding about these families.
- Check the formulation against each client's goals and context by asking what closeness with family means to them and what they want to change.
- Take the pattern to consultation and revise the treatment plans where her value, rather than the client's aim, had set the direction.
Reflection becomes practice when a noticed value or bias leads to a checked formulation and a changed plan.
Vérifiez vos acquis
Under APA Ethics Code Standard 2.06, when should a psychologist act on a personal problem that may interfere with their work?
Sources
- Schön (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Chapter 2, From Technical Rationality to Reflection-in-Action
- APA (2017), Multicultural Guidelines: An Ecological Approach to Context, Identity, and Intersectionality; summarized in Clauss-Ehlers, Chiriboga, Hunter, Roysircar and Tummala-Narra (2019), APA Multicultural Guidelines executive summary: Ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality, American Psychologist (PMID 30762387), Guideline 2 (psychologists as cultural beings whose attitudes and beliefs shape perceptions and conceptualizations)
- Hall and colleagues (2015), Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review, American Journal of Public Health (PMID 26469668), Abstract: main results (levels similar to the general population; associations with interactions, treatment decisions and outcomes)
- Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlmann and Banaji (2009), Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (PMID 19586237), Abstract: average predictive validity of IAT measures
- Oswald, Mitchell, Blanton, Jaccard and Tetlock (2013), Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: a meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (PMID 23773046), Abstract: IATs poor predictors of most criterion categories
- APA (2017), Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2002, amended 2010 and 2016), Standard 2.06, Personal Problems and Conflicts
- Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists, Fourth Edition (CPA, 2017), Principle II, Responsible Caring (competence and self-knowledge; self-care)
- Nissen-Lie, Rønnestad, Høglend, Havik, Solbakken, Stiles and Monsen (2017), Love yourself as a person, doubt yourself as a therapist?, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy (PMID 26450342), Abstract: results and key practitioner messages
